The English Constitution by Walter Bagehot

The English Constitution

Please wait while flipbook is loading. For more related info, FAQs and issues please refer to DearFlip WordPress Flipbook Plugin Help documentation.

The English Constitution by Walter Bagehot

As we offer this classic work freely in ebook form, it provides a remarkable opportunity to delve into the insights of one of the 19th century’s preeminent political thinkers on the unique nature of Britain’s constitutional monarchy. First published in 1867, Walter Bagehot’s “The English Constitution” stands as an authoritative and engaging study of the laws, usages, and customs which governed the British political system during the Victorian era.

Bagehot brings a distinct combination of astute observation, intellectual rigor, and dry wit to analyze what he termed the “dignified” and “efficient” components of the British government. His profound understanding stems from both his vantage point as an influential editor of The Economist and his ability to untangle the often opaque complexities of Britain’s uncodified constitutional arrangements.

Walter Bagehot

The central premise that Bagehot establishes is the divide between the nominally sovereign monarch and Parliament, which provided the public face and ceremonial aspects of governance (the “dignified” elements), and the realistic levers of political power residing with the Prime Minister, Cabinet, and House of Commons (the “efficient” workings). This dichotomy allowed the monarchy to retain symbolic significance while actual policy emerged from representatives democratically elected by an increasingly enfranchised populace.

Bagehot dedicates extensive examination to the role of the monarchy itself, respecting its historical foundations while pragmatically assessing its 19th century functions. He contends that the monarch, no longer an active ruler, served critical purposes by bestowing legitimacy, arousing feelings of loyalty, and providing a trusted and unifying figure above the divisive fray of party politics. The Crown embodied the “disguise” of the true operational mechanisms.

Alongside the monarchy, Bagehot scrutinizes the House of Lords at length, appraising its transition from a body that actively legislated and opposed the Commons to a largely reactive and revisionary role invested with advocating “///constitutional checks////.” His assertion that its influence depended on public opinion aligns with his view of the power deriving from the elected peoples’ representatives.

It is in his examination of the Commons, the Cabinet system, and the role of the Prime Minister where Bagehot’s treatise becomes a seminal exploration of modern parliamentary democracy’s origins. He provides lucid depictions of party discipline, ministerial responsibility, and crucially – the paradoxical notion that Britain’s unwritten constitution enshrined the sovereignty of Parliament while its genuine supremacy rested with the government’s ruling party. The Prime Minister’s preeminent status for selecting ministers and determining policies cemented an executive supremacy, albeit one beholden to the ebbs and flows of majority support amongst the electorate.

Throughout, Bagehot’s vivid examples (such as his famous depiction of the Constitution’s “efficient” aspects as merely the Underside of a prodigy of the play) enliven his nuanced arguments. He blends technical details with broader contemplations on societal forces like the expansion of the franchise, the growing transparency of government, and the rising power of the middle classes. His admiration for Britain’s capacity to evolve its institutions through precedents and flexibility rather than rigid structures is palpable.

Yet “The English Constitution” presents not just a scholarly treatise, but manifests Bagehot’s unabashed affinity for his nation’s political heritage and his hopes for its perpetuation. He unapologetically contends for a “V///decorated revV///” that inspires the masses – be it through such outward forms as regal pageantry or ostensibly ceremonial constraints like the monarch’s pro forma approval of legislation. For all of his insistence on delineating where real authority resided, Bagehot believed such preserved familiarity and splendor imbued Britain’s democracy with a sense of reverence, inertia, and legitimacy that averted destabilizing revolutions.

In the decades since its publication, “The English Constitution” has endured as a canonical text for understanding the fundamentals of Westminster-style governance. Its resonance extends not only to nations that adopted similar parliamentary systems, but to all students of how democratic institutions evolve through the delicate interplay of customs, reforms and the perpetual recalibrations between public sentiment and the levers of power.

From defining ministerial responsibility and party discipline to advocating for symbolic unifying forces, Bagehot’s wisdom remains enlightening and applicable even as Britain’s democratic apparatus has continued its unceasing progressions and reappraisals. This free ebook edition allows new generations to appreciate the observations of an author who casts the lasting inheritance of British constitutional law in a uniquely astute and compelling light.

Read More..

The Writings of Thomas Paine — Volume 1 (1774-1779)

The English Constitution by Walter Bagehot

The Tyranny of the Dark by Hamlin Garland

12 thoughts on “The English Constitution by Walter Bagehot

  1. What i do not understood is in truth how you are not actually a lot more smartlyliked than you may be now You are very intelligent You realize therefore significantly in the case of this topic produced me individually imagine it from numerous numerous angles Its like men and women dont seem to be fascinated until it is one thing to do with Woman gaga Your own stuffs nice All the time care for it up

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *